"We own the science"
A glimpse into how the United Nations and Google collude — to privilege their catastrophist dogma, above all other information regarding climate change.
!["We own the science" "We own the science"](https://rudd-o.com/archives/we-own-the-science/@@images/image-800-a6debd90b066231089b1a68d444eb10c.jpeg)
When anyone tells you that Google is great because it surfaces the best information thanks to the best algorithms, make sure to know they deliberately — no algorithm involved — AstroTurf the political positions of their partners first.
Here is Melissa Fleming from the U.N., letting you in on that little secret during a WEF talk:
Does it not fill you with rage, to hear this woman proclaim "we own the science", so smugly and cavalierly? In at least a very real sense, they do own the science — they own the pockets and souls of all the corrupt scientists happy to get government / NGO grants to study climate... so long as they tell the U.N. what they want to hear — "more intrusion into private lives is necessary!"
Ownership denotes the right to exclude. To "own the science" means exactly that: formal, systematic exclusion of perspectives and findings. What is a science that excludes new, alternative hypotheses? (Hint: it is not science.)
Where there's power, there's the potential for that power to be abused. If the power in question is the power to brainwash people into a certain doomsday cult, you bet it will be abused. And if there's money to be made, well, there will be no shortage of "science man" to buy.
![](https://rudd-o.com/archives/we-own-the-science/fd-fxh0xgaevtkb.jpeg/@@images/image/tile)