-
Intellectual monopolies are not property
by Rudd-O
—
published
Feb 27, 2009
—
last modified
Jun 26, 2013 03:24 AM
—
filed under:
copyrights,
patents
When we discuss copyrights and patents with others, there's always someone who insists that they are forms of property. They are not, and here's why.
Located in
Monopolies of the mind
-
Not everything you work for, you own
by Rudd-O
—
published
Feb 27, 2009
—
last modified
Jul 20, 2020 11:31 AM
—
filed under:
copyrights,
patents
Intellectual property defenders talk about the fact that you "created your idea" or "put labor in your invention" as the reason why they own these ideas and ...
Located in
Monopolies of the mind
-
Digital Restrictions Management: it's wrong
by Rudd-O
—
published
Nov 20, 2006
—
last modified
Jul 26, 2015 08:55 PM
—
filed under:
DRM,
MP3,
music,
copyrights
Located in
Monopolies of the mind
-
I'm sorry, I cannot hear what you're saying over the noise of your hypocrisy
by Rudd-O
—
published
Apr 21, 2009
—
last modified
Jun 26, 2013 03:24 AM
—
filed under:
file sharing,
hypocrisy,
copyrights,
Internet
Clown Lars Gustafsson toes the corrupt party line, has the audacity to demand "free speech".
Located in
Monopolies of the mind
-
Intellectual monopolies are not property, and duplicating them is not theft, part 2
by Rudd-O
—
published
Feb 14, 2012
—
last modified
Jul 26, 2015 08:55 PM
—
filed under:
lies,
copyrights,
patents
A longer explanation of what property is, why intellectual poverty (the proposition that one may morally prevent others from duplicating intangibles) is false, ...
Located in
Monopolies of the mind
-
What makes Microsoft a monopoly?
by Rudd-O
—
published
May 25, 2009
—
last modified
Jun 26, 2013 03:24 AM
—
filed under:
monopolies,
copyrights,
Microsoft,
software
Hint: it's not their market share in the PC software market.
Located in
Monopolies of the mind
